• Research
  • Education
  • Publications and Data
  • People
  • News
  • Contact
  • Suomeksi

WDRGWDRGWDRGWDRG
Menu
  • Research
  • Education
  • Publications and Data
  • People
  • News
  • Contact
  • Suomeksi

An automatic combination of existing forecasting approaches can help reduce flood impacts

14.03.2022

Share this post

In the fall of 2019, a weather phenomenon known in Spain as “DANA” or “Gota Fría” devastated the south-eastern part of the country. Torrential rains of 460 mm in 24 hours caused floods in numerous locations, claiming a total of seven lives and more than EUR 2.2 billion losses.

 

 

During such events, civil protection authorities and other emergency services rely on flood forecasts for coordinating emergency response measures such as evacuations, warnings, or road closures. Since floods can arise from a variety of physical processes, they are commonly categorised into the following flood types: fluvial floods, flash floods, pluvial (urban) floods, and coastal floods. Traditionally, forecasting approaches are designed separately for these different flood types. In the current practice, emergency managers monitor these separate (and potentially conflicting) forecasts side-by-side and combine them to make operational decisions. Especially in complex and fast-evolving flood situations, this procedure can be time-consuming and confusing, and ultimately compromise the effectiveness of the emergency response.

 

In a recent collaborative study with the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (JRC) we targeted this issue and developed the first system that jointly forecasts fluvial floods and flash floods. In contrast to traditional forecasting approaches, floods are directly forecasted in terms of the following socio-economic impacts categories: populations at risk, economic losses, and affected critical infrastructures. Such impact-based forecasts are more easily interpretable for emergency managers than traditional hydrological flood forecasts, which further adds to the practical value of the developed system.

 

We tested the system for the floods of 2019 in Southeast Spain, in which a combination of fluvial floods and flash floods was responsible for the catastrophic impacts (a so-called “compound flood”). While the two separate methods for fluvial floods (EFAS RRA) and flash floods (ReAFFIRM) missed some significant impacts, the combined system succeeded to identify the most important impacts reported by civil protection authorities, insurance companies, and the media. This illustrates how an automatic combination of flood type-specific approaches can improve the performance of existing forecasts.

 

In the future, it would be beneficial to integrate also approaches for pluvial and coastal flooding into the system, in order to create a full compound flood impact forecast encompassing all common types of flooding. Such a fully integrated system would significantly enhance the decision support available for emergency managers and thus help reduce the impacts of floods.

Fig: Flooded areas along the Segura River in the Murcia Region, Spain. Photo credit: Gobierno de España, 2019

 

 

Josias Láng-Ritter is a postdoctoral researcher at Aalto University, working with WDRG and the Geoinformatics Research Group. He aims to improve water resources management in transboundary river basins by means of artificial intelligence. Before joining Aalto, he developed flood forecasting approaches in Spain and dam control strategies in Colombia.

Tweet

Related Post

NOVEMBER 2, 2022

Expert Elicitation Explained...

(by: Daniel Chrisendo) There are so many...

00

AUGUST 17, 2022

Water networks, but not the...

When we think of water networks, we usually...

00

JUNE 30, 2022

Match words with deeds:...

17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were...

00
Here you can read blogs, research highlights, newsletters and other news from Water and Development Research Group.

Newsletters

  • WDRG Newsletter 1/2023
  • WDRG Newsletter 3/2022
  • WDRG Newsletter 2/2022
  • WDRG Newsletter 1/2022
Newsletter Archive →

News Archive

  • November 2022
  • August 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • June 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • September 2018
  • July 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • October 2017

Contact info

Aalto University

Water & Development Research Group
Aalto University
P.O.Box 15200
FIN-00076 Aalto
Finland

Aalto University is a multidisciplinary university, where science and art meet technology and business. We are committed to identifying and solving grand societal challenges and building an innovative future.

© Water and Development Research Group. Aalto University School of Engineering

Recent news

  • Expert Elicitation Explained by an Expert November 2, 2022
  • Water networks, but not the way you think August 17, 2022
  • Match words with deeds: Curbing water risk with the Sustainable Development Goal 6 index June 30, 2022
  • The Devil is in the Details: Opportunities and Harms of Water Hyacinth around Lake Victoria May 27, 2022
  • A simple solution for disaster water treatment May 2, 2022

Twitter feed

Tweets by AaltoWAT

© 2020 WDRG, All Rights Reserved.